Overview

DIVISION OF NEURONIC ENGINEERING

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

3.5

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

63.2 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

95.3 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is moderate, 63.2%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

DIVISION OF NEURONIC ENGINEERING

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 4.1 2.5 3.3 2.3 2.3 4.7 1.8 20.9 80.7% 1.0
Article, other 0.1 NA 0.2 NA 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.3 100.0% 0.5
Conference paper, peer review 0.7 0.1 2.1 0.2 2.2 1.5 NA 6.8 9.4% 0.9
Conference paper, other 0.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.7 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 1.0 0.0% 0.0
Report NA NA NA 0.1 NA NA NA 0.1 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 8 8 7 5 7 11 3 49 83.7% 1
Article, other 1 NA 1 NA 1 1 1 5 100.0% 0
Conference paper, peer review 1 1 5 1 5 4 NA 17 11.8% 1
Conference paper, other 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0
Chapter in book NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 1 0.0% 0
Report NA NA NA 2 NA NA NA 2 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

DIVISION OF NEURONIC ENGINEERING

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 1.8 8.2 4.7 0.5 28.6%
2015 2.0 8.3 4.2 0.6 30.7%
2016 2.6 11.5 4.4 0.0 0.0%
2017 2.3 13.2 5.6 0.2 7.1%
2018 2.1 10.6 5.1 0.0 0.0%
Total 10.8 51.8 4.8 1.3 11.9%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 6.4 1.26 0.8 12.9%
2015-2017 7.0 1.27 0.9 13.0%
2016-2018 7.0 1.17 0.6 9.0%
2017-2019 8.6 1.24 1.2 14.3%
Total 15.0 1.25 2.1 13.7%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 4 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 36.8%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 17 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 66.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

DIVISION OF NEURONIC ENGINEERING

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 6.4 1.02 1.3 20.2%
2015-2017 7.0 1.02 1.3 18.5%
2016-2018 7.0 1.07 1.5 21.1%
2017-2019 8.6 0.92 0.9 10.0%
2018-2020 8.7 0.91 0.9 9.8%
Total 17.5 0.95 2.1 12.3%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 17 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 66.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

DIVISION OF NEURONIC ENGINEERING

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 16 1 6.2% 8 50.0%
2015-2017 17 2 11.8% 8 47.1%
2016-2018 16 2 12.5% 5 31.2%
2017-2019 21 3 14.3% 7 33.3%
2018-2020 20 2 10.0% 7 35.0%
Total 41 4 9.8% 16 39.0%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 16 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 73.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
United States 10 9 1 0 0 2.2
China 3 3 0 0 0 1.1
Belgium 4 4 0 0 0 0.9
Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Australia 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Mexico 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Qatar 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 1.9
National Board of Forensic Medicine Other Public Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 1.3
Uppsala University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 1.3
CHONGQING UNIVERSITY University China 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
Southern Methodist University University United States 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
Stanford University University United States 6 6 0 0 0 0.9
Catholic University of Leuven University Belgium 4 4 0 0 0 0.9
Dainese Company Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Federation University Australia University Australia 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of New South Wales University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Eindhoven University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Karolinska University Hospital University Hospital Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Board of Health and Welfare Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Stevens Institute of Technology University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Arizona University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Pittsburgh University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Uppsala University Hospital University Hospital Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Autonomous University of Queretaro (UAQ) University Mexico 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
French National Centre for Scientific Research Other Public France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Sorbonne Paris Cité University (USPC) University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Washington State University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Duke University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Shandong University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Aspetar Other health services Qatar 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences University College Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Institute Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Tokyo Medical and Dental University University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Innsbruck University Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Salzburg University Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Virginia University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Waterloo University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Wake Forest University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0

Open Access

DIVISION OF NEURONIC ENGINEERING

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 6 1 0 0 0 1 5 16.7%
2015 7 2 0 0 2 0 5 28.6%
2016 7 2 0 0 0 2 5 28.6%
2017 5 3 1 1 1 0 2 60.0%
2018 6 4 3 1 0 0 2 66.7%
2019 13 6 2 1 3 0 7 46.2%
2020 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.0%
Total 48 18 6 3 6 3 30 37.5%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

DIVISION OF NEURONIC ENGINEERING

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 4.1 94.7 23.2 0.7 16.3%
2015 2.1 39.2 18.7 0.0 0.0%
2016 5.1 59.4 11.6 0.5 9.7%
2017 2.5 37.4 14.8 0.0 0.0%
2018 4.4 17.4 3.9 1.3 30.1%
2019 6.2 37.9 6.1 0.5 8.0%
2020 2.5 4.3 1.7 0.8 32.7%
Total 27.0 290.3 10.7 3.8 14.1%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 3 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 80.8%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 10.7 1.85 3.2 29.7%
2015-2017 9.8 1.48 2.8 28.2%
2016-2018 12.1 1.12 2.3 19.1%
2017-2019 13.2 1.11 1.3 10.1%
Total 23.9 1.44 4.5 18.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 25 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 89.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 8.0 1.25 4.0 50.3%
2015-2017 7.5 1.33 4.3 57.6%
2016-2018 7.5 1.37 4.7 62.0%
2017-2019 9.6 1.16 5.3 55.1%
2018-2020 9.8 1.19 4.6 47.3%
Total 20.2 1.22 10.2 50.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 25 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 89.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 26 1 3.8% 9 34.6%
2015-2017 24 1 4.2% 10 41.7%
2016-2018 28 0 0.0% 9 32.1%
2017-2019 33 0 0.0% 15 45.5%
2018-2020 31 0 0.0% 14 45.2%
Total 63 1 1.6% 25 39.7%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 24 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 90%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row